Chris Chivers (Thinks)

  • Home
  • Blog-Thinking Aloud
  • How can I help?
  • Contents
  • PDFs
  • Sing and strum

Progress; what does it look like?

2/2/2015

0 Comments

 
In attending the Optimus Education conference on assessment, I was able to listen to Colin Watson, who is Deputy Director, Assessment Policy and Development at the Standards and Testing Agency in the DfE. I’m almost tempted to suggest his importance is embedded in the number of capitals in his title.

It was an interesting talk, not least because this was someone working right at the heart of Government, so should be able to give such detailed information that everything in assessment would be absolutely clear. I was disappointed, therefore with both the general and specific aspects of his talk.

Take an early slide. The case for change. The removal of levels was articulated as “not consistent with the approaches to curriculum freedoms”. Now, forgive me, but the new NC does not appear to allow much in the way of “freedoms”, especially with the recent suggestions on test expectations.

The second reason was that “expectations are too low” as “fewer than half of those who reach current standard achieve 5 good GCSEs”. Again, forgive me, but is it only the fault of the Primary sector if, during the five years to GCSE that learners do not make the necessary progress to GCSE C+ grades from a level 4?

The third reason also baffled me. That the “current measure does not recognise performance before the end of KS1. As head of a Primary school, we did baseline assessments with our reception children. In the autumn, the County would distribute very thick booklets based on the school data, that showed progress from R to end of KS1 and then from KS1 to KS2. This document supported discussions with Attached Inspectors.  

It seemed to me that assessment, at least in the eyes of the DfE and despite acknowledging that “formative assessment is vital”, is simply testing, with a focus on Baseline, KS1 and KS2 in Primary. That’s what they will focus on.

Schools will have the “freedom” to develop (or purchase) an assessment system that suits their school that;

  • Aligns well with their curriculum.

  • Sets out what children are expected to know, understand and do, and when

  • Explains pupils’ progress and attainment to parents

  • Can be used to set aspirational targets and wherever possible supports pupils to reach the expected standards.

The first two points, to me simply state that you have to have a curriculum and an overview. The latter two are the more worrying, in that progress and attainment may not be the same and without great clarity, the only aspiration might be to achieve “at standard”, especially if not achieving 100% might result in headteacher sacking.

Where Colin Watson did, in my opinion, fall down, was an inability to describe progress, which is the backbone of all teaching and learning decisions, as understanding the principles of progression and child development supports decisions in planning, “delivery”, engagement, feedback and adaptation of lessons, reviews and subsequent decisions. Progress between the test points is in school hands.

There were a number of different structures on sale during the event, and a couple of providers gave talks. It has been clear to me, from the outset, that, while “levels” as numeric items would disappear from use, the notion of “levelness” could not, as the original level descriptors, in my eyes and in my practice, formed the basis for judgements about pupil outcomes. As an aside, I have yet to see a Secondary School arguing for not using GCSE criteria to support learners. The words matter. It is the description of what progression looks like that is important.

If I was still a headteacher, especially in writing and reading, what I’d want to do would be multi-layered.

See my blog on “One book for all writing in Primary”, as a central principle for improving writing quality.

  • First, in order to achieve the new “standards”, I’d be adjusting the end of Key Stage expectations, at least to 2b and 4b equivalence, then adjust the descriptor language to suit.

  • Create a development ladder of statements that take the children from the earliest stages through the significant development points. Personal target extracts, on flip-out sheets, would provide the short term goals to be used in conjunction with the writing book.

  • Every six weeks, a whole school writing project would result in whole school outcomes. Take to school hall and arrange from start points to the best available.

  • Discussions would take place between staff to moderate decisions, using the language of descriptors. The discussion between year 2 and 3 would be especially important, to ensure continuity. The moderation discussion would also be part of internal staff CPD.

  • The outcomes would be collated as an internal exemplar reference portfolio. Over time a range of moderated portfolios would develop. Essential for less experienced staff.

  • With colleague schools, or an external moderator, to develop moderation activities to validate internal judgements.

  • It is conceivable that current data tracking programs could be used to track progress as now, but with an adjusted expectation.

I’d also want a similar activity linked to reading. I have a personal preference for colour coded systems, which, if organised correctly, automatically link with reading ages, so if a child can read fluently, with expression and appropriate understanding, they are at least at that reading age. It is a relatively simple guide and can enable children to develop the reading habit and to find pleasure in doing so. Development statements can be on personal bookmarks, with guidance to listeners.

  • In this way, a clear narrative can be developed about expectation, aspiration and personal target setting. This narrative will be essential to share with external inspectors or similar.

  • The progress of individuals is the significant aspect in all this.

  • We have to be in a position to grow children, not just to see how they measure up.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Chris Chivers

    Long career in education, classroom and leadership; always a learner.
    University tutor and education consultant; Teaching and Learning, Inclusion and parent partnership.
    Francophile, gardener, sometime bodhran player.

    Archives

    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All
    Assessment
    Behaviour
    Differentiation
    English
    Experience
    History
    Inclusive Thinking
    Maths
    Parents
    Science
    SEND
    Sing And Strum
    Teaching And Learning

    RSS Feed

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture
    Click to set custom HTM L
Proudly powered by Weebly